Control of semi-active suspensions for in-wheel electric vehicles

dc.audience.educationlevelInvestigadores/Researcherses_MX
dc.contributor.advisorMorales Menéndez, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorAnaya Martínez, Mauricio
dc.contributor.catalogeremipsanchezes_MX
dc.contributor.committeememberVargas Martínez, Adriana
dc.contributor.committeememberRamirez Mendoza, Ricardo Ambrocio
dc.contributor.departmentEscuela de Ingeniería y Cienciases_MX
dc.contributor.institutionCampus Monterreyes_MX
dc.contributor.mentorLozoya Santos, Jorge de Jesús
dc.creatorMORALES MENENDEZ, RUBEN; 30452
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-28T01:11:50Z
dc.date.available2021-09-28T01:11:50Z
dc.date.created2020-06
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.description0000-0003-0498-1566es_MX
dc.description.abstractWith the electric vehicles highly adoption, there is a need for keeping improving automotive systems. This work is focused on exploring the use of semi-active suspension systems in in-wheel electric vehicles. For that, two different in-wheel concepts are considered. When a brush-less DC (BLDC) motor and when a switched reluctance motor (SRM) are employed. In the SRM, an unbalanced vertical force is taken into account for the vertical dynamics model. The vertical dynamics tests are performed making use of models from one-quarter of vehicle (QoV) andf ull vehicle. Four different semi-active controllers, as well as three current levels, are evaluated and compared in time and frequency domain when employed in the in-wheel and internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. The suspension objectives improvement is estimated by making use of some performance indexes. Where the obtained results are compared against the ones given by the 1.25A and F-class baseline suspensions. The results showed that when compared against the F-class baseline suspension, none of the controllers is giving human and ride comfort improvements for the in-wheel electric vehicles. While, in comparison with the 1.25A baseline, the FEB controller is providing the best increase (25%−50%). By the side of the road holding and handling, the M1S guarantees the road holding and handling improvement (10%-25%) for the BLDC. While for the SRM, the FEB controller improves them when compared against the F-class baseline suspension. When taking as reference the 1.25A baseline suspension, the road holding and handling are enhanced by the 1.25A baseline and GH, respectively, for the BLDC. While in the SRM, the FEB controller is giving the best improvement(10%−55%). In most cases, high and low current values guarantee the comfort and road holding improvements, respectively.es_MX
dc.description.degreeMaestro en Ciencias con especialidad en Sistemas de Manufacturaes_MX
dc.format.mediumTextoes_MX
dc.identificator7||33||3313||331399es_MX
dc.identifier.citationAnaya, M. (2020). Control of semi-active suspensions for In-wheel electric vehicles. (Tesis de Maestría).Tecnologico de Monterrey. Recuperado de: https://hdl.handle.net/11285/639408es_MX
dc.identifier.cvu930302es_MX
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2538-2749es_MX
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11285/639408
dc.language.isoenges_MX
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterreyes_MX
dc.relationCONACYTes_MX
dc.relationTecnológico de Monterreyes_MX
dc.relation.impreso2020-06-16
dc.relation.isFormatOfversión publicadaes_MX
dc.relation.isreferencedbyREPOSITORIO NAIONAL CONACYT
dc.rightsopenAccesses_MX
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0es_MX
dc.subject.classificationINGENIERÍA Y TECNOLOGÍA::CIENCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS::TECNOLOGÍA E INGENIERÍA MECÁNICAS::OTRASes_MX
dc.subject.keywordin-wheeles_MX
dc.subject.keywordsemi-activees_MX
dc.subject.keywordsuspensionses_MX
dc.subject.keywordEV’ses_MX
dc.subject.keywordautomotivees_MX
dc.subject.keywordcontroles_MX
dc.subject.keywordswitchedes_MX
dc.subject.keywordreluctancees_MX
dc.subject.keywordmotores_MX
dc.subject.keywordSRMes_MX
dc.subject.lcshTechnologyes_MX
dc.titleControl of semi-active suspensions for in-wheel electric vehicleses_MX
dc.typeTesis de maestría

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AnayaMartinez_TesisMaestriaPDFA.pdf
Size:
6.76 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tesis de Maestría
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Committee Signatures - Tesisl_Mauricio_AnayaM_16jun20.pdf
Size:
309.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Hoja de firmas
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CartaAutorizacionTesis.pdf
Size:
202.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Carta de autorización

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.3 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
logo

El usuario tiene la obligación de utilizar los servicios y contenidos proporcionados por la Universidad, en particular, los impresos y recursos electrónicos, de conformidad con la legislación vigente y los principios de buena fe y en general usos aceptados, sin contravenir con su realización el orden público, especialmente, en el caso en que, para el adecuado desempeño de su actividad, necesita reproducir, distribuir, comunicar y/o poner a disposición, fragmentos de obras impresas o susceptibles de estar en formato analógico o digital, ya sea en soporte papel o electrónico. Ley 23/2006, de 7 de julio, por la que se modifica el texto revisado de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, aprobado

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025

Licencia