Artículo
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11285/345284
Artículo científico o editorial en una publicación periódica académica sujeto a revisión de pares. Cumple con los índices internacionales o bases de datos de amplia cobertura, como el listado del Current Contents, ISI WEB of Knowledge (http://isiknowledge.com/) e índice de revistas mexicanas de CONACYT (www.conacyt.mx/dac/revistas). Éstos indizan y resumen los artículos de revistas seleccionadas, en todas las áreas del saber.
Browse
Search Results
- eComplexity: psychometric properties to test the validity and reliability of the instrument(ERIC, 2024-07) Castillo Martínez, Isolda Margarita; Velarde Camaqui, Davis; Ramírez Montoya, María Soledad; Sanabria Zepeda, Jorge Carlos; https://ror.org/03ayjn504Reasoning for complexity is a fundamental competency in these complex times for solutions to social problems and decision-making. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the eComplexity instrument by presenting its psychometric properties. The instrument consists of a Likert-type scale questionnaire designed to measure college students' perceptions of their mastery levels of complex reasoning competency as well as the subcompetencies that comprise it. The instrument was applied to higher education students in different countries of Latin America and Spain. The questionnaire articulates four types of thinking: systemic, scientific, critical and innovative and consists of 25 items. The methodology used was instrumental and psychometric, which seeks to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the eComplexity questionnaire. The results obtained from the research were as follows: The exploratory factor analysis indicated a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index (KMO) > .80, a significance of p< .05 and a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.93. Likewise, a Confirmatory Factor Analysis was carried out and was possible to corroborate the internal structure validity of the instrument. In addition to Cronbach's Alpha coefficient, McDonald's Omega, and Guttman's Lambda coefficients were calculated to calculate reliability. With the results obtained it was possible to conclude that the instrument is valid and reliable, can be used in various university contexts to support integrated training necessary to address current challenges and contribute to educational research. It is recommended for future studies that the research can be expanded by using an instrument that can move from perceptual terms to measuring levels of complex reasoning mastery, but it is valuable to contrast with the students' perception to have a broader vision.
- eComplexity: validation of a complex thinking instrument from a structural equation model(Frontiers, 2024-05-24) Vázquez Parra, José Carlos; Henao Rodriguez, Linda Carolina; Lis-Gutiérrez, Jenny Paola; Castillo Martínez, Isolda Margarita; Suarez Brito, Paloma; https://ror.org/03ayjn504The eComplexity instrument aims to measure the perception of achievement in the complex thinking competency and its sub-competencies. To ensure the reliability of this instrument, validation processes like the one presented in this article are necessary. Methodologically, this study evaluates data from 1,037 university students in Mexico, confirming the statistical validity and reliability of the instrument. As a result, the demonstrated reliability of the eComplexity instrument as a tool for measuring perceived achievements in complex thinking provides a valuable resource for assessing the effectiveness of educational interventions. Consequently, this research contributes to a more informed approach to fostering critical thinking skills, benefiting both theoretical exploration and practical application in educational settings. The study employs the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate students’ self-perceptions of their performance in complex thinking and its sub-competencies, thus advancing the field of educational measurement. Academically, it enriches the discourse on the design and validation of instruments, offering a rigorous model for future efforts in measuring cognitive competencies. Practically, the study’s results inform educational practice by identifying systemic and scientific thinking as key to developing complex thinking skills. This knowledge enables educators to more effectively adapt teaching strategies and curricular designs, aiming to enhance students’ ability to navigate the complexities of the modern world.
- Development of complex thinking in entrepreneurship training: A gender approach(2024-02-15) Alonso Galicia, Patricia Esther; Vázquez Parra, José Carlos; Castillo Martínez, Isolda Margarita; Ramírez Montoya, María Soledad; https://ror.org/03ayjn504This article aims to approach students’ perception of mastery of the reasoning-for-complexity competency and its sub-competencies (scientific, systemic, and critical thinking) in a sample group at aLatin American university. The intention was to identify whether there are statistically significant differences in a population of men and women in a training program in entrepreneurship, assessing whether gender could be a factor to consider by educational institutions offering these specialties. The present exploratory study applies the validated E-Complexity instrument to measure the perception of a convenience sample of 116 students from a private university in Mexico. Statistically, the overall mean and the means for each item were calculated for the students’ perception of their mastery of the reasoning-for-complexity competency. From the results, we can confirm that no statistically significant evidence demonstrates differences between men and women in their perceived mastery of the reasoning-for-complexity competency in general. However, analyzing the results by sub-competencies shows that women tend to have a higher perception than their male counterparts. Thus, this article shows the need to develop environments beyond academia and theory, guaranteeing an actual follow-through to equality promoted within educational institutions.
- eComplex: validity and reliability of rubric for assessing reasoning for complexity competency(Springer, 2023-06-29) Castillo Martínez, Isolda Margarita; Ramírez Montoya, María Soledad; Glasserman Morales, Leonardo David; Millán Arellano, Jorge Antonio; https://ror.org/03ayjn504In the absence of available instruments that measure reasoning-for-complexity competency in higher education, we designed a rubric to measure university students' levels of mastery of that competency. This article presents the process to estimate the validity and reliability that led to the final version of the "eComplex" rubric, which consists of 27 items. This validation process considered experts' consultation, the internal consistency estimation using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and correlation matrix analysis, there was also qualitative analysis by reviewing the experts' comments in detail and making the appropriate adjustments. The results were: (a) a high concordance index of the judges for the evaluated criteria of the items, (b) an instrument with high internal consistency and reliability, and (c) improvement in the wording of the items thanks to the observations and contributions of the experts, this was reinforced by conducting a second phase of expert validation using the Delphi Method to provide further support for the Clarity criterion. The instrument is expected to validate measuring the development and appropriation of reasoning-for-complexity competency in university students.
- Academic literacy among the university students in Mexico and Spain: A holistic perspective(2023-01-16) Ramírez Montoya, María Soledad; Castillo Martínez, Isolda Margarita; Cerros Regalado, Cynthia Patricia; Glasserman Morales, Leonardo David; Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de MonterreyCurrently, young people have access to a large amount of information, so they must have the ability to critically analyze the texts they are exposed to in order to choose those that are useful for their training or research process, as well as to have the necessary skills to interact efficiently with the texts, especially with those specialized documents corresponding to their area of study. In this regard, this article aims to identify how cognitive, emotional, attitudinal, digital and personality aspects influence the development of academic literacy skills in university students.
- Research competencies to develop academic reading and writing: A systematic literature review(Frontiers Media SA, 2021-01-18) Castillo Martínez, Isolda Margarita; Ramírez Montoya, María Soledad; Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey; Jun Zhang, LawrenceRationale: The development of research skills in the higher education environment is a necessity because universities must be concerned about training professionals who use the methods of science to transform reality. Furthermore, within research competencies, consideration must be given to those that allow for the development of academic reading and writing in university students since this is a field that requires considerable attention from the educational field at the higher level. Objective: This study aims to conduct a systematic review of the literature that allows the analysis of studies related to the topics of research competencies and the development of academic reading and writing. Method: The search was performed by considering the following quality criteria: (1) Is the context in which the research is conducted at higher education institutions? (2) Is the development of academic reading and writing considered? (3) Are innovation processes related to the development of academic reading and writing considered? The articles analyzed were published between 2015 and 2019. Results: Forty-two papers were considered for analysis after following the quality criterion questions. Finally, the topics addressed in the analysis were as follows: theoretical–conceptual trends in educational innovation studies, dominant trends and methodological tools, findings in research competencies for innovation in academic literacy development, types of innovations related to the development of academic reading and writing, recommendations for future studies on research competencies and for the processes of academic reading and writing and research challenges for the research competencies and academic reading and writing processes. Conclusion: It was possible to identify the absence of studies about research skills to develop academic literacy through innovative models that effectively integrate the analysis of these three elements.
- Complex thinking in the framework of Education 4.0 and Open Innovation—A systematic literature review(MDPI, 2021-01-04) Ramírez Montoya, María Soledad; Sanabria Zepeda, Jorge Carlos; Castillo Martínez, Isolda Margarita; Miranda Mendoza, Jhonattan; Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de MonterreyToday’s complex, dynamic, interconnected world presents the field of education (“Education 4.0”) with significant challenges in developing competencies for reasoning for complexity. This article analyzes complex thinking as a macro-competency with sub-competencies of critical, systemic, scientific, and innovative thinking in educational environments. We worked with the systematic literature review method, selecting 35 articles in the Scopus and Web of Science databases using keywords words of interest and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seven research questions guided the data analysis. The results highlighted that: (a) there are common characteristics of studies linking complex thinking, critical thinking, and creative thinking; (b) there is predominance of the qualitative method in the studies; (c) the critical thinking competency has been the most addressed in the research; (d) the predominant components of Education 4.0 are teaching methods and techniques; and (e) the three challenges that stand out for educational research are project feasibility, research opportunities, and required skills. This article is intended to be of value to academic and social communities and decision-makers interested in developing reasoning for complexity within the framework of Education 4.0.