Comparative genomics of bacterial and plant folate synthesis and salvage: predictions and validations

dc.contributor.authorde Crécy Lagard, Valérieen
dc.contributor.authorEl Yacoubi, Basmaen
dc.contributor.authorde la Garza, Rocío Den
dc.contributor.authorNoiriel, Alexandreen
dc.contributor.authorHanson, Andrew Den
dc.contributor.departmentTecnologico de Monterreyen
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-20T03:23:30Z
dc.date.available2016-06-20T03:23:30Z
dc.date.issued23/07/2007
dc.date.updated2016-06-01T12:18:30Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Folate synthesis and salvage pathways are relatively well known from classical biochemistry and genetics but they have not been subjected to comparative genomic analysis. The availability of genome sequences from hundreds of diverse bacteria, and from Arabidopsis thaliana, enabled such an analysis using the SEED database and its tools. This study reports the results of the analysis and integrates them with new and existing experimental data. Results Based on sequence similarity and the clustering, fusion, and phylogenetic distribution of genes, several functional predictions emerged from this analysis. For bacteria, these included the existence of novel GTP cyclohydrolase I and folylpolyglutamate synthase gene families, and of a trifunctional p-aminobenzoate synthesis gene. For plants and bacteria, the predictions comprised the identities of a 'missing' folate synthesis gene (folQ) and of a folate transporter, and the absence from plants of a folate salvage enzyme. Genetic and biochemical tests bore out these predictions. Conclusion For bacteria, these results demonstrate that much can be learnt from comparative genomics, even for well-explored primary metabolic pathways. For plants, the findings particularly illustrate the potential for rapid functional assignment of unknown genes that have prokaryotic homologs, by analyzing which genes are associated with the latter. More generally, our data indicate how combined genomic analysis of both plants and prokaryotes can be more powerful than isolated examination of either group alone.
dc.identifier.otherBMC Genomics. 2007 Jul 23;8(1):245
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-245
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11285/613679
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherOpen Access Publisheren
dc.relation.urlhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-8-245en
dc.rights.holderde Crécy-Lagard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.disciplineCiencias de la Salud / Health Sciences
dc.titleComparative genomics of bacterial and plant folate synthesis and salvage: predictions and validationsen
dc.typeArtículo
html.description.abstractAbstract Background Folate synthesis and salvage pathways are relatively well known from classical biochemistry and genetics but they have not been subjected to comparative genomic analysis. The availability of genome sequences from hundreds of diverse bacteria, and from Arabidopsis thaliana, enabled such an analysis using the SEED database and its tools. This study reports the results of the analysis and integrates them with new and existing experimental data. Results Based on sequence similarity and the clustering, fusion, and phylogenetic distribution of genes, several functional predictions emerged from this analysis. For bacteria, these included the existence of novel GTP cyclohydrolase I and folylpolyglutamate synthase gene families, and of a trifunctional p-aminobenzoate synthesis gene. For plants and bacteria, the predictions comprised the identities of a 'missing' folate synthesis gene (folQ) and of a folate transporter, and the absence from plants of a folate salvage enzyme. Genetic and biochemical tests bore out these predictions. Conclusion For bacteria, these results demonstrate that much can be learnt from comparative genomics, even for well-explored primary metabolic pathways. For plants, the findings particularly illustrate the potential for rapid functional assignment of unknown genes that have prokaryotic homologs, by analyzing which genes are associated with the latter. More generally, our data indicate how combined genomic analysis of both plants and prokaryotes can be more powerful than isolated examination of either group alone.
refterms.dateFOA2018-03-18T16:29:37Z

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 5 of 13
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12864_2006_Article_958.pdf
Size:
892.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12864_2006_958_MOESM1_ESM.xls
Size:
2.53 MB
Format:
Unknown data format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12864_2006_958_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Size:
28.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12864_2006_958_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
Size:
11.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12864_2006_958_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Size:
263.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.42 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections

logo

El usuario tiene la obligación de utilizar los servicios y contenidos proporcionados por la Universidad, en particular, los impresos y recursos electrónicos, de conformidad con la legislación vigente y los principios de buena fe y en general usos aceptados, sin contravenir con su realización el orden público, especialmente, en el caso en que, para el adecuado desempeño de su actividad, necesita reproducir, distribuir, comunicar y/o poner a disposición, fragmentos de obras impresas o susceptibles de estar en formato analógico o digital, ya sea en soporte papel o electrónico. Ley 23/2006, de 7 de julio, por la que se modifica el texto revisado de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, aprobado

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026

Licencia